Article

Modern Pharmacotherapy for Obesity: Advances, Limitations, and Translational Potential

Ji-hye Lee1,6, Chang-Whan Yoon2,3,6, Sei-Young Lee4, Jae Jun Lee1,#, Jung-Ha Kim5,#

▼ Affiliations
1Non-clinical evaluation center, Osong Medical Innovation Foundation (KBIOHealth), Korea
2Medical Research Institute, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Korea
3Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Korea
4Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
5Department of Family Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul 06973, Korea
6These authors contributed equally


Corresponding Author: Jung-Ha Kim, Department of Family Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul 06973, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2001-2264. Email: girlpower219@cau.ac.kr

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Obesity is a chronic, relapsing metabolic disease characterized by dysregulated energy homeostasis, neuroendocrine dysfunction, and systemic inflammation. Its increasing global prevalence is strongly associated with cardiometabolic disorders, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. This review summarizes recent advances in anti-obesity pharmacotherapy, focusing on incretin-based therapies, their mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, current limitations, and future therapeutic directions.


Methods: Recent preclinical, translational, and clinical studies evaluating pharmacological treatments for obesity were comprehensively reviewed. Evidence was integrated to assess the mechanisms, efficacy, safety, and translational potential of GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists, and emerging multi-target therapeutic strategies.


Results: Incretin-based therapies have transformed obesity treatment by targeting the gut–brain axis to reduce appetite, delay gastric emptying, and improve glucose homeostasis. GLP-1 receptor agonists consistently induce clinically meaningful weight loss of approximately 10–15%, while dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists achieve reductions exceeding 20%, approaching the efficacy of bariatric surgery. However, current therapies remain limited by interindividual variability in treatment response, gastrointestinal adverse effects, weight regain after discontinuation, and restricted accessibility. Moreover, these agents primarily reduce energy intake and incompletely address impaired energy expenditure and adipose tissue dysfunction.


Conclusions: Modern obesity pharmacotherapy has evolved from modest single-target interventions to highly effective mechanism-based therapies. Future strategies incorporating multi-receptor agonists, amylin-based agents, combination regimens, and precision medicine approaches are expected to improve therapeutic durability, efficacy, and individualized treatment, ultimately reducing the global burden of obesity.

Keywords

Obesity, GLP-1 receptor, GIP receptor, Adipose Organoids

Introduction

Obesity is now widely recognized as a chronic, relapsing metabolic disease characterized by dysregulated energy homeostasis, hormonal imbalance, and systemic inflammation. Adipose tissue functions as an active endocrine organ, influencing insulin sensitivity, lipid metabolism, and systemic metabolic regulation [1, 2].

The global burden of obesity continues to escalate, with strong associations to cardiometabolic diseases, including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [3-5]. Importantly, obesity acts as a central driver of disease pathogenesis rather than merely a contributing factor.

Although lifestyle interventions remain fundamental, their long-term effectiveness is limited by compensatory physiological mechanisms, including reduced energy expenditure and increased appetite. These limitations underscore the need for effective pharmacological strategies [6, 7].

In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of modern pharmacotherapy for obesity, focusing on incretin-based therapies and emerging multi-target approaches.


Figure 1. Systemic impact of obesity on multi-organ pathophysiology. Obesity acts as a central driver of multiple disease processes, including cardiometabolic disorders, NAFLD, respiratory dysfunction, renal impairment, psychological disorders, musculoskeletal abnormalities, reproductive complications, and malignancies. These effects are mediated through interconnected mechanisms such as insulin resistance, chronic inflammation, and metabolic dysregulation.

Evolution of Anti-Obesity Pharmacotherapy

Traditional anti-obesity therapies primarily targeted appetite suppression or nutrient absorption, reflecting a limited understanding of obesity pathophysiology. Centrally acting agents, such as phentermine, were effective in reducing appetite but were associated with cardiovascular risks and potential for abuse [8]. Combination therapies such as fenfluramine–phentermine were withdrawn due to serious adverse effects.

Peripherally acting agents, such as orlistat, achieved modest weight loss (~3–5%) but were limited by gastrointestinal side effects and poor adherence. Later therapies improved efficacy (5–10% weight loss) but continued to raise safety and tolerability concerns.

Overall, these approaches were limited by modest efficacy and their focus on single pathways, leading to the development of more comprehensive therapeutic strategies.

Incretin-Based Pharmacotherapy

The development of incretin-based therapies represents a major paradigm shift. GLP-1 receptor agonists regulate body weight through appetite suppression, delayed gastric emptying, and improved metabolic control [3].

Clinical studies have shown that semaglutide induces 10–15% weight loss, significantly outperforming earlier therapies [9]. Dual agonists such as tirzepatide achieve >20% weight loss, approaching bariatric surgery outcomes [10].

These therapies also provide broad metabolic benefits, including improved glycemic control and reduced cardiovascular risk, establishing their role as disease-modifying treatments.

Recent evidence further indicates that incretin-based therapies exert pleiotropic effects beyond appetite regulation, including modulation of inflammation, improvement of adipose tissue function, and potential impact on energy expenditure pathways [11, 12]. These findings suggest that incretin signaling may serve as a central regulatory axis linking metabolic control to systemic disease progression.

Current Limitations of Incretin Therapies

Despite their efficacy, several limitations remain. Treatment response varies significantly among individuals, reflecting the heterogeneity of obesity. Gastrointestinal adverse effects may limit adherence, and weight regain after discontinuation highlights the chronic nature of the disease.

In addition, high cost and limited accessibility restrict real-world application. Mechanistically, these therapies primarily reduce energy intake and have limited effects on energy expenditure, indicating incomplete metabolic control.

These challenges highlight the need for more comprehensive therapeutic approaches. In addition, emerging data suggest that long-term metabolic adaptation and compensatory neuroendocrine responses may attenuate therapeutic efficacy over time, further emphasizing the need for strategies that address both central and peripheral metabolic regulation [13].

Recent Trends in Obesity Pharmacotherapy

Recent research emphasizes obesity as a heterogeneous, systems-level disease driven by complex interactions among metabolic, neuroendocrine, and environmental factors [1, 2]. Incretin-based therapies have transformed treatment outcomes, and dual agonists demonstrate the advantages of multi-hormonal regulation [3, 9, 10]. Recent advances also highlight the importance of targeting adipose tissue remodeling and systemic metabolic crosstalk, including interactions between adipose tissue, liver, pancreas, and the central nervous system [14]. These insights support the development of integrated therapeutic approaches that extend beyond single-organ targeting.

Recent advances in obesity pharmacotherapy have expanded beyond glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) to include multiple hormonal pathways that regulate energy balance and metabolism. GLP-1 receptor agonists remain the cornerstone of current pharmacological treatment, promoting weight loss through central appetite suppression, delayed gastric emptying, and enhanced glucose-dependent insulin secretion [3, 9]. Clinically approved agents such as semaglutide have demonstrated robust and sustained weight reduction, establishing GLP-1 signaling as a key therapeutic axis in obesity management.

In parallel, therapies targeting glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) have gained significant attention. Although the role of GIP in obesity has historically been controversial, recent evidence suggests that both GIP receptor agonism and antagonism may exert beneficial metabolic effects depending on the context. Dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists, such as tirzepatide, enhance weight loss through synergistic incretin signaling, improving insulin sensitivity and energy balance [10]. Conversely, GIP receptor antagonists are also under investigation for their potential to counteract obesity-associated metabolic dysregulation.

Beyond incretin-based approaches, glucagon receptor agonists represent another promising class of anti-obesity agents. Glucagon signaling increases energy expenditure, lipolysis, and hepatic fatty acid oxidation, making it an attractive target for weight reduction. However, its hyperglycemic effects have limited its use as monotherapy, leading to the development of multi-agonist strategies, such as GLP-1/glucagon co-agonists, that balance metabolic benefits while minimizing adverse effects [10].

In addition, amylin receptor agonists have emerged as a complementary therapeutic approach. Amylin, a hormone co-secreted with insulin, regulates satiety and gastric emptying. Long-acting amylin analogs, such as cagrilintide, have demonstrated significant weight loss effects, particularly when combined with GLP-1 receptor agonists, suggesting a synergistic mechanism targeting both central and peripheral pathways [15].

Collectively, these emerging pharmacological strategies highlight a shift toward multi-hormonal and multi-target approaches, aiming to address both energy intake and expenditure. This transition reflects a move toward mechanism-based therapeutic strategies for improved efficacy and durability. Furthermore, the integration of incretin-based therapies with additional metabolic regulators is increasingly being explored to overcome therapeutic plateaus and enhance long-term weight maintenance.


Figure 2. Mechanistic comparison of GLP-1 receptor agonists and dual incretin receptor agonists. GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., semaglutide) primarily reduce body weight through appetite suppression, delayed gastric emptying, and enhanced insulin secretion. In contrast, dual incretin receptor agonists (e.g., tirzepatide) integrate GLP-1 and GIP signaling, resulting in enhanced regulation of appetite, satiety, and glucose metabolism. This multi-hormonal mechanism contributes to superior weight loss efficacy compared to single-pathway therapies.

Future Perspectives

Future obesity pharmacotherapy is expected to shift beyond single-target interventions toward integrated, multi-target therapeutic strategies. A key driver of this transition will be the incorporation of physiologically relevant organoid models into obesity research and drug development. Patient-derived adipose, intestinal, hepatic, and pancreatic organoids faithfully recapitulate tissue architecture, cellular heterogeneity, and metabolic function, thereby overcoming many limitations of conventional two-dimensional cultures and animal models [16].

Advances in biomarker discovery and systems biology will enable precision medicine approaches, allowing for individualized treatment strategies. These developments are expected to improve both clinical outcomes and real-world applicability.

These platforms provide powerful tools for investigating obesity-associated metabolic dysfunction, identifying novel therapeutic targets, evaluating drug efficacy and safety, and predicting patient-specific treatment responses. Furthermore, integration of organoid technologies with multi-omics approaches, including transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics, is expected to accelerate biomarker discovery and elucidate mechanisms underlying therapeutic responsiveness and resistance.


Figure 3. Establishment of mouse adipose tissue-derived organoids. Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells were isolated from mouse adipose tissue and cultured under three-dimensional conditions to generate adipose organoids. Representative bright-field images depict organoid development and maturation, while H&E staining confirms the structural organization of mature adipose organoids. Scale bars, 50 μm.

Combined with advances in systems biology and artificial intelligence-driven data analysis, organoid-based precision medicine platforms have the potential to optimize individualized treatment selection, improve long-term therapeutic outcomes, and facilitate the clinical translation of next-generation anti-obesity therapies (Figure 3). Collectively, organoid technology is poised to become a cornerstone of future obesity research, bridging mechanistic discoveries with personalized therapeutic development.

Discussion

Incretin-based pharmacotherapies represent a major advancement in obesity treatment by targeting the gut–brain axis. These agents provide substantial weight loss and metabolic improvements, establishing a new therapeutic standard [3, 9]. Notably, recent studies suggest that obesity-associated metabolic dysregulation involves complex inter-organ communication networks, reinforcing the need for therapeutic strategies that target systemic rather than isolated pathways.

However, limitations remain, including variability in response, adverse effects, and high cost. Additionally, current therapies do not fully address all aspects of obesity pathophysiology, particularly energy expenditure and adipose dysfunction.

Future strategies should focus on improving therapeutic durability, specificity, and accessibility, with an emphasis on multi-target approaches and precision medicine.

Conclusion

Modern pharmacotherapy for obesity has evolved into highly effective, mechanism-based therapies, particularly incretin-based agents targeting the gut–brain axis. These advances have significantly improved treatment outcomes and expanded therapeutic potential.

Nevertheless, challenges remain, including variability in response, limited long-term durability, and accessibility issues. Continued integration of mechanistic insights, multi-target strategies, and precision medicine will be essential to optimize treatment and reduce the global burden of obesity. Moreover, the convergence of multi-target pharmacology and precision medicine is expected to redefine future therapeutic paradigms in obesity management.

References

  1. Bluher M: Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2019, 15(5):288–298.
  2. Hruby A, Hu FB: The Epidemiology of Obesity: A Big Picture. Pharmacoeconomics 2015, 33(7):673–689.
  3. Kahn SE, Hull RL, Utzschneider KM: Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nature 2006, 444(7121):840–846.
  4. Khafagy R, Dash S: Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease: The Emerging Role of Inflammation. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021, 8:768119.
  5. Younossi ZM, Golabi P, Paik JM, Henry A, Van Dongen C, Henry L: The global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a systematic review. Hepatology 2023, 77(4):1335–1347.
  6. Hall KD, Kahan S: Maintenance of Lost Weight and Long-Term Management of Obesity. Med Clin North Am 2018, 102(1):183–197.
  7. Greenway FL: Physiological adaptations to weight loss and factors favouring weight regain. Int J Obes (Lond) 2015, 39(8):1188–1196.
  8. Bray GA, Ryan DH: Medical therapy for the patient with obesity. Circulation 2012, 125(13):1695–1703.
  9. Bergmann NC, Davies MJ, Lingvay I, Knop FK: Semaglutide for the treatment of overweight and obesity: A review. Diabetes Obes Metab 2023, 25(1):18–35.
  10. Srivastava G, Kumar RB: Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. N Engl J Med 2021, 385(1):e4.
  11. Nauck MA, Meier JJ: Incretin hormones: Their role in health and disease. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018, 20 Suppl 1:5–21.
  12. Drucker DJ: Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Application of Glucagon-like Peptide-1. Cell Metab 2018, 27(4):740–756.
  13. Dulloo AG: Adaptive thermogenesis driving catch-up fat during weight regain: a role for skeletal muscle hypothyroidism and a risk for sarcopenic obesity. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2025, 26(5):871–888.
  14. Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM: What we talk about when we talk about fat. Cell 2014, 156(1-2):20–44.
  15. Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Stefanski A: Tirzepatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Obesity. Reply. N Engl J Med 2022, 387(15):1434–1435.
  16. Hasin Y, Seldin M, Lusis A: Multi-omics approaches to disease. Genome Biol 2017, 18(1):83.

Abstract

Introduction 

Materials and Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion